If the purpose or consideration of an agreement is the execution of an act prohibited by law, the agreement is annulled. Acts or undertakings prohibited by law are punishable by law, as are those prohibited (explicitly or implicitly) by specific legislation of Parliament and state legislators. Any agreement involving or involving a violation of persons or other property is considered illegal and therefore not a sidekick. Children, people with mental disabilities and seniors with dementia are some examples of parties that may not be able to understand and enter into a legal contract. The law of the contracts depends on the content of the contract. Suppose, for example, that there was an employment contract for a poker dealer in a state where gambling is illegal. The contract would be illegal because it requires that employee to do illegal activities, in this case gambling. Immoral agreements will never be tested because of the application of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. All agreements, where they have been found to be contrary to or contrary to recognized normal moral standards, are considered invalid and illegal because they are immoral. Immorality has never been accepted in its long time, so the law will never allow it to continue to be accepted in the future. The scope of immoral agreements will continue to change as time evolves, but will never be within the scope of Section 23, making them illegal and unenforceable. Example 1: A, an owner, rented his house to B, a commercial sex worker, knowing that it would be used for immoral trade.
The landlord can`t get the rent back. Here, the object is immoral, the rent payment agreement is invalid. However, for an agreement to be declared illegal and non-aeig, because of fraudulent use or consideration, fraud must be unequivocally proven and cannot be based on mere suspicion and presumption. One of these conditions is based on the immorality of the object or immoral reflection in an agreement. This means that when an agreement is infected with immorality, either in the form of an immoral object or an immoral consideration, such agreements are considered illegal and not admitted in the eyes of the law. Immoral agreements that do not meet widely respected moral standards have never been protected from the law since time immobilization. A change of era always marks a change in social norms, especially when it comes to determining what is immoral and therefore illegal. Therefore, it is not possible for the law to generally limit the scope of immoral treaties. Immorality is a fluid concept that can only be determined by current standards and standards and recent judgments.
But the consequence of an agreement that is immoral will always remain the same, illegal and unenforceable.